Skip to content

Legal & Compliance

This document provides comprehensive legal and regulatory compliance framework for AI Wallet operations across multiple jurisdictions. Objective: Establish compliance posture that enables rapid market entry while managing regulatory risk across stored value, AI governance, and data protection.

Executive Summary

Based on GTM analysis, AI Wallet operates in a complex regulatory environment requiring careful navigation of: - Stored Value Regulations: Non-redeemable credit model to avoid e-money complexity - AI Governance: Provider ToS alignment and emerging AI-specific regulations - Data Protection: Multi-jurisdiction compliance (US, EU, GCC, China) - Enterprise Requirements: SOC 2, audit trails, and data residency expectations

Core Compliance Framework

Stored Value and Money Transmission

GTM-Derived Strategy: - Primary Approach: Non-redeemable credits with Stripe integration - Rationale: Avoid e-money regulations by selling consumable credits, not storing monetary value - Multi-Rail Option: Stripe fiat + Coinbase Commerce USDC for global coverage - Legal Review: Seek counsel as expansion into new regions (EU, GCC) with stored value laws

Implementation Requirements: 1. Credit Structure: Credits must be consumable service units, not currency substitutes 2. Terms of Service: Clear language that credits are non-refundable, non-transferable service tokens 3. Geographic Restrictions: Block regions with strict e-money laws until legal review complete 4. Documentation: Maintain detailed transaction records for regulatory review

Regulatory Risk Mitigation: - Pass-through billing model where possible (users pay providers directly) - Transparent fee structure without hidden markups - Clear user consent and terms acceptance - Regular legal review of terms and regional compliance

Provider Terms of Service Alignment

Critical Provider Requirements:

OpenAI Terms: - No resale of API access without explicit permission - No training of competing models on provider data - Attribution requirements for certain usage levels - Content policies and usage restrictions

Anthropic Terms: - Similar restrictions on resale and competitive use - Strict content and safety requirements - Attribution for certain tier usage - Rate limiting and usage monitoring requirements

Google Terms: - Enterprise-specific terms for Vertex AI - Data residency and privacy requirements - Usage analytics and model improvement opt-outs - Attribution and branding requirements

Compliance Strategy: 1. Due Diligence: Maintain current copy of all provider ToS 2. Usage Monitoring: Implement systems to track usage against provider limits 3. Attribution Compliance: Automatically include required attributions 4. Content Filtering: Implement provider-compliant content moderation 5. Rate Limiting: Enforce provider-specific rate limits automatically

Multi-Jurisdiction Data Protection

United States - Primary Law: CCPA (California) + state-level privacy laws - Requirements: Consumer data rights, opt-out mechanisms, data deletion - Business Model: Business-to-business service reduces direct consumer obligations - Implementation: Standard privacy policy, data processing agreements

European Union - Primary Law: GDPR compliance required for EU users - Critical Requirements: - Data processing legal basis (legitimate interest for fraud prevention) - Data subject rights (access, portability, deletion) - Data Protection Impact Assessment for high-risk processing - Cross-border data transfer mechanisms (Standard Contractual Clauses) - Timeline: Full compliance before EU market entry

GCC Region (Saudi Arabia, UAE) - Saudi Arabia: PDPL (Personal Data Protection Law) compliance - UAE: Federal Law on Data Protection - Key Requirements: - Data residency for certain data types - Explicit consent for data processing - Data transfer restrictions - Local representative requirements for some operations

China - Primary Law: PIPL (Personal Information Protection Law) - Additional Requirements: - ICP filing for mini-programs and web services - Data localization for critical data - Security assessment for cross-border data transfers - AI content labeling requirements (Deep Synthesis measures)

AI-Specific Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Readiness - Timeline: Enforcement begins August 2025 for transparency requirements - AI Wallet Classification: Likely "General-Purpose AI" (GPAI) system - Requirements: - Transparency about AI use and model providers - User disclosure of AI-generated content - Technical documentation and risk management - Human oversight mechanisms

US AI Governance - Executive Order 14110: Federal AI safety and rights framework - State Level: California's AI accountability measures - Requirements: Risk assessment, bias monitoring, human oversight

GCC AI Strategy Alignment - Saudi Vision 2030: AI governance framework - UAE AI Strategy 2031: National AI governance standards - Compliance: Align with national AI strategies for government contracts

Enterprise Compliance Requirements

SOC 2 Type II Certification

  • Timeline: 6-12 months for initial certification
  • Scope: Security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality
  • Cost: $50,000-150,000 for initial certification
  • Benefits: Required for enterprise sales, reduces due diligence burden

ISO 27001 Information Security

  • Relevance: International standard for information security management
  • Timeline: 12-18 months for certification
  • Benefits: Enterprise customer confidence, competitive differentiation

Regional Data Residency

  • EU: Data processing and storage within EU/EEA
  • US: No specific requirements, but industry standards apply
  • GCC: Local data storage requirements for government contracts
  • Implementation: Multi-region infrastructure with data localization options
  • Requirement: Granular consent for different types of AI processing
  • Implementation:
  • Clear consent mechanisms for model access
  • Separate consent for usage analytics
  • Easy consent withdrawal mechanisms
  • Consent receipt generation and storage

Audit Trail Requirements

  • Content: User actions, model usage, spending patterns, consent changes
  • Retention: Minimum 2-7 years depending on jurisdiction
  • Access: User access to their own audit data
  • Export: Machine-readable format for compliance reporting

API Terms and Rate Limiting

  • Fair Use: Clear terms on API usage and rate limits
  • Abuse Prevention: Automated systems to detect and prevent abuse
  • Transparency: Clear communication about usage limits and overage policies

Risk Assessment and Mitigation

High-Risk Areas

  1. Stored Value Classification: Risk of e-money regulation
  2. Provider ToS Violations: Risk of API access termination
  3. Cross-Border Data Transfers: Risk of regulatory action
  4. AI Content Liability: Risk of user-generated content issues

Mitigation Strategies

  1. Legal Review: Quarterly review of terms and regional requirements
  2. Insurance: Professional liability and cyber insurance
  3. Technical Controls: Automated compliance monitoring
  4. Legal Partnerships: Relationships with privacy and tech law firms in key markets

Compliance Implementation Timeline

Phase 1 (0-3 months)

  • [ ] Implement non-redeemable credit model
  • [ ] Basic privacy policy and terms of service
  • [ ] Provider ToS compliance monitoring
  • [ ] Initial data protection impact assessment

Phase 2 (3-6 months)

  • [ ] GDPR compliance for EU users
  • [ ] SOC 2 readiness assessment
  • [ ] Audit trail implementation
  • [ ] Consent management system

Phase 3 (6-12 months)

  • [ ] SOC 2 Type II certification
  • [ ] ISO 27001 certification process
  • [ ] GCC data residency implementation
  • [ ] AI governance framework compliance

Governance Structure

Compliance Team

  • Chief Privacy Officer: Overall compliance strategy
  • Legal Counsel: Contract and regulatory review
  • Security Officer: Technical security and SOC 2 compliance
  • Product Compliance: Feature-level compliance implementation

Board Oversight

  • Quarterly Compliance Reviews: Board-level compliance reporting
  • Risk Committee: High-level risk assessment and mitigation
  • External Audit: Annual third-party compliance review

Key Performance Indicators

Compliance Metrics

  • Time to Compliance: New jurisdiction entry timeline
  • Incident Response: Security/privacy incident resolution time
  • Audit Success: Internal and external audit results
  • Customer Requirements: Enterprise compliance requirement fulfillment rate
  • Regulatory Inquiries: Number and resolution time
  • Provider Issues: ToS compliance violations
  • Data Subject Requests: GDPR/CCPA request handling time
  • Cross-Border Transfers: Compliance with data transfer requirements

Source Attribution

Primary source for regulatory analysis: GTM-01Nov25-ChatGPTPlus.pdf