Market Traction Signals
This document defines traction signals for pre/early-MVP and how we instrument them. Objective: Prioritize evidence that matters to developers, partners, and investors.
Key Insights
- Traction quality > vanity: integrations, budget enforcement events, and consent receipt exports beat raw signups.
- Design partners (3–5 indie apps) with real usage and clear governance needs are the best early signal.
- Dual-track YC + angels/VCs is viable if we show learning velocity and usage proof.
Sources
- archive/AI_Wallet_Topical_Threads/YC-VCMarket-ExposureRisks-05Nov25-ChatGPTPlus.pdf
- docs/04-marketing-growth/launch-plan.md
- docs/07-fundraising/investor-outreach.md
Decisions/Implications
- Instrument leading indicators: #integrations, budgets enforced, receipt exports, WAU, partner pipeline velocity.
- Publish a weekly traction snapshot in Command Center; keep claims tied to verifiable events.
- Use design-partner outcomes directly in investor updates; avoid overfitting to application deadlines.
Next Actions
- Add dashboards for the above indicators; wire to weekly review.
- Define success thresholds per indicator (e.g., first 50 active users, 10+ budget locks, 3 receipt export audits).
- Gather consent from partners to share anonymized case studies.
Suggested Sections
- Leading vs lagging indicators
- Evidence types and logging
- Dashboard and cadence
- Case-study pipeline
- Risks and mitigations
- Open questions